Soon i'll have about 15k devices that connect to my company each using a TCP connection to verify that the devices and connections are still functioning properly. Each device will connect every few minutes. To reduce the load on the server I'd like to limit the amount of TCP connections per device per minute.
Is this possible with a router?
Which series of routers will I be looking at? (since i'm pretty sure this isn't possible/viable on a small buisiness router)
Is it better to keep the TCP connection alive or to terminate it after it's done (short and low bandwidth connections)?
I'm working for an independant alarm central/control room.
Soon providers will stop with analog connections so we'll have to switch all devices to IP.
We want to use this transition to improve our service (end-to-end test happens now standard once every day) to end-to-end tests every 5 min. But alarm devices are known to have a technical hick-up once in a while which makes them to try to connect more then they should. Which may put the server under (too much) stress.
It's not possible to limit the total amount of tcp connections since if a few are acting up, the amount of tcp connections will be saturated and a real alarm might be dropped.
At this moment I gave up on the idea of being able to do that on the router (which would have saved costs), but now I'm looking if it's possible with Snort
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.