02-14-2012 04:21 AM - edited 03-07-2019 04:55 AM
Hi,
In my central location, I have a network with ASA, two 3750's as core/distro switches and a couple of 2960's as access switches. I have also one 1841 to server some special functions and as a ASA backup.
At branch office, there are a 1941 as core/distro router and also a couple of 2960's as access switches.
One branch office is not far away (~5km) so I'm interested if is there a point to connect it with a central location through a fiber connection? I know that 1941 has limitation of 25Mbps, but I'm not sure what is meant on that? Is that 25Mbps of routed or bridged traffic? Is it per port or aggregate? What's the point of Gigabit Ethernet interfaces if I can't get more than 25Mbps?
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-14-2012 05:59 AM
Hi,
Have a look at this link re router performances.
http://www.cisco.com/web/AP/ANZ_PE/borderless_network/Cisco_routerperformance.pdf
The Mbps is the FAST/CEF switching rate. Like all routers Qs are involved. This figure is NOT the interface line speed
Your Gigabit interface will use wire speed
IE 10/100/1000 what ever you set it for or whatever it auto negotiates to.
Your data sheet is here for a 1941:-
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10538/data_sheet_c78_556319.html
Your Gigabit interfaces are RJ45 copper, therefore you would need some fibre to copper convertors or may be the NTE from your service providers
HTH
Alex
02-14-2012 05:59 AM
Hi,
Have a look at this link re router performances.
http://www.cisco.com/web/AP/ANZ_PE/borderless_network/Cisco_routerperformance.pdf
The Mbps is the FAST/CEF switching rate. Like all routers Qs are involved. This figure is NOT the interface line speed
Your Gigabit interface will use wire speed
IE 10/100/1000 what ever you set it for or whatever it auto negotiates to.
Your data sheet is here for a 1941:-
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10538/data_sheet_c78_556319.html
Your Gigabit interfaces are RJ45 copper, therefore you would need some fibre to copper convertors or may be the NTE from your service providers
HTH
Alex
02-14-2012 06:33 AM
Thanks for reply.
Our requirements are 50 Mbps via fiber line, so I believe that 1941 will handle it well, including the fact that there is no encryption, no PBR, only couple of ACL and one GRE tunnel.
And one more question: I fullfiled both ethernet ports. Is it needed to get additional module with RJ45 ports or I can plug media convertor into 2960 and then virtualy connect it with 1941 via VLAN and subinterface? Can 2960 handle it?
02-14-2012 07:52 AM
Hi,
Yes you can use your 2960.
These are usually kept to layer 2 (MAC) not layer 3 (IP)
So you want to configure the port for the fibre link as an access port and somehow allow the VLAN to the router.
2960
!
vlan 777
name FIBRE LINK
!
interface g0/1
desc *** LINK VIA FIBRE TO HQ ***
switchport host
switchport access vlan 777
no shut
!
int g0/2
desc *** LINK TO 1941 ***
switchport trunk encap dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk vlan allowed 1,2.3,777,xxx
!
HTH
Alex
02-14-2012 08:00 AM
And on the 1941:
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.777
description Management
encapsulation dot1Q 777
ip address 192.168.1.xxx 255.255.255.0
!
Thanks for help!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide