Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Memory Leak Detector

I used the following entry on Cat6500

show memory debug leaks

and it took up 100% of the CPU. Can 'show' commands eat up so much of CPU. I believe they are only display commands.

Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: Memory Leak Detector

Hello Cisco_lite,

debug commands can have such a disruptive effect on the network device even on a powerful one like a C6500 with Sup720.

For example by using a debug stp I caused a C4500 to become unusable and I needed someone to reload it !

Actually, displaying in a console has a great impact on the system you should

increase the local logging buffer size to 1000000 bytes or more

logging buffered

logging console 4

set logging console 4 to avoid to see debug messages on the fly then later you see the logging buffer by using

sh log

Think that usually is less heavy to export log messages to a syslog server then to have them displayed on the console or VTY connection.

We used this method of exporting to a syslog with logging disabled on the console, to get some debug outputs for Cisco TAC during some Service Request.

Hope to help


New Member

Re: Memory Leak Detector

Thanks. But I was assuming the entry tp be show command and not debug. I believed debug commands had to start with 'debug'.