"we" have a Catalyst 3750 switch on which we configured 2 static routes. See attachment for the logical design.
We configured the following static routes:
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.11
ip route 192.168.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.12
In the routing table we only see the B-class network, the 192.168.0.0 /20 route. In my opinion, there should be both routes because there is no summarization cause we have 2 different gateways. The routes will be redistributed into 2 EIGRP processes, but this should not be the problem.
Does anybody ever had this problem or do you see any misconfiguration?
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...