Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

moving packets, smaller or bigger

Hi all, when moving packets on a network, what is best, lots of small packets, or less bigger packets ?

6 REPLIES

Re: moving packets, smaller or bigger

Your main concern should be if packets are being fragmented too much. Your mtu should be set to allow throughput without too much fragmentation. Default mtu is 1500, and is generally optimal for most networks.

HTH,

John

HTH, John *** Please rate all useful posts ***
Super Bronze

Re: moving packets, smaller or bigger

Efficiency improves (less overhead vs. payload) as packet size increases. Also, network devices, such as many software based routers, can process a certain number of packets per second which, although decreases as packet size increases, can forward more "volume" as packet size increases. (These are reasons why later Ethernet devices often support some type of "jumbo" packets.)

New Member

Re: moving packets, smaller or bigger

what is the reasons for this?

Super Bronze

Re: moving packets, smaller or bigger

Reasons for what?

New Member

Re: moving packets, smaller or bigger

why is it more efficient to send bigger packets ?

Super Bronze

Re: moving packets, smaller or bigger

L2 and L3 have overhead per frame and packet. For instance, a typical Ethernet non-VLAN tagged frame has 38 bytes of overhead (interfame GAP, preamble, src/dest MAC addresses, CRC, etc.) IP has 20 bytes of overhead, mostly IP addresses. TCP usually adds another 20 bytes of overhead (or more with some TCP options). So to send 1 character/byte in a single TCP packet on Ethernet, you're looking at something like 78 bytes, or more, on the wire to pass your 1 byte of data. Rather poor efficiency. As the number of data payload bytes is increased, since overhead stays the same, efficiency improves.

118
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content