Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Multiple trunks between switches

I'm relatively new to the field and need some advice. I have a request from above to physically segregate traffic on a particular vlan from the rest of the network. My question is basically whether or not this can be accomplished by having two trunk ports with different vlans on each trunk between the switches and if this could cause issues (STP?).

Example of what I'm trying to accomplish

Switch A

Port 1 Trunking vlans 1-4

Port 2 Trunking vlans 5-8

Switch B

Port 1 Trunking vlans 1-4

Port 2 Trunking vlans 5-8

Just to limit anyone's time who looks at this putting in more switches is out and etherchannel has been considered.

Thanks in advance.

  • LAN Switching and Routing
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

Yes but the switching fabric is greater than one individual port so by separating the vlans over 2 separate ports you are in fact spreading the load altho it is very dependant on per vlan traffic amount.

I would also recommend Adam's suggestion of using the links as backups for each by manipulating the STP priority.

Jon

6 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

Heath

This won't physcially segregate the traffic as such. You are still using the same switch infrastructure just with 2 trunks instead of one.

You can do what you suggest but it amy help to have more details. To stop one vlan communicating with others you could access-lists on the L3 vlan interfaces or you might not even need a L3 vlan interface for this isolated vlan.

Either way if you need to physcially segregate then you need separate switches etc.

Jon

New Member

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

Yeah, I realize that I'm not actually physically segregating the network. What I meant to say was to decrease the utilization on the link. Will that even be achieved though? It still goes through the same switching fabric at the switches.

The goal here isn't to stop communications between the vlans but to limit possible congestion.

Feel free to tell me if I'm being to vague.

Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

Yes but the switching fabric is greater than one individual port so by separating the vlans over 2 separate ports you are in fact spreading the load altho it is very dependant on per vlan traffic amount.

I would also recommend Adam's suggestion of using the links as backups for each by manipulating the STP priority.

Jon

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

Hi

What you have suggested is fine and will work.

Maybe a better solution would be to trunk all 8 vlans across both trunks and use STP (802.1w or 802.1s) to load balance by changing the priority on the 2 groups so switch A is root for 1-4 and switch B is root for 5-8. This At least this way you will have a "hot standby" link in case one dies.

New Member

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

Thanks guys. That answered my questions.

Re: Multiple trunks between switches

even if you keep one switch is the root (which is easy)

on the root switch go to trunk one for example and just increase the port priority for vlans 1-4)

do the same on trunk 2 on the root switch but for other vlans

this way you will make each trunk in forwarding state for each group of vlans

which wil loadbalnce the traffic over your trunks

this works if you have those switches only and connected directly

HTH

1752
Views
3
Helpful
6
Replies