What exactly is the value proposition of the Cisco FEX architecture solution?
From my understanding, the 2124, 2248 and 2232 FEXes are 1 RU appliances that act as ToR switches for server access connectivity.
Basically, each FEX ToR appliance is logically a blade in a virtual chassis, in which the Cisco Nexus 5000 acts as a Supervisor module. The Nexus 5000 is where all the configuration, management and intelligence resides. This provides for centralized management of the physical servers, as well as the virtual servers through VN-Link technology.
Is this about it? The FEXes are simply dumb blade switches that have no configuration requirements? What else is the big benefit of the FEX architecture?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.