At work we are in the middle of a massive project which includes building two new datacentres and redesigning our campus. I'm looking after the design for the campus network and need some advice.
So the campus will be OSPF area 176 and the datacenters area 0.
There are two Cisco 3560E switches installed as the core of the campus network. There are linked via two 10Gb links and configured in an etherchannel. The two datacentres connect to these two switches as well.
So my question is about the etherchannel link between the two core switches. See the diagram in the link below, area 0 and area 176 will potentially need to traverse this link if there is ever a break in on of the primary paths.
So the discussions we have had at work is around the routing configuring of the core switch interconnect. Should it be:
a) A routed etherchannel (no switchport command) with the etherchannel in area 0 b) A routed etherchannel (no switchport command) with the etherchannel in area 176 c) A layer 2 trunk etherchannel, using two VLAN interfaces on each end used for routing. So there would be for example, interface vlan 100 in area 0 on both switches interface vlan 200 in area 176 on both switches.
The concensus at work is that C is the way to go, but i just wanted other options as to the pros and cons of each option...
If the topology is exactly as you have shown in the figure (with no extra links / devices) then just using the core to core interconnect configured as a Layer-3 point-to-point interface part of Area 0 should suffice. If, however, there can be potential situations where a switch will continue to advertise a summary while one of the local interconnects has failed then you are better off with going with option 3 (have a logical interconnect in both Area 0 and 176).
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...