Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

OSPF - redis connected vs using area

Can someone give me any pros and cons for this:

redistributing connected routes + summarizing at ASBR versus creating new Area and summarizing at ABR.

When I try both scenarios, I see that I have a smaller ospf database with redistributing connected subnets.

When I look at the neighbors, The only difference I see if type-5 vs type-3.

Can anyone give me some info on why one is better?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Hall of Fame Super Bronze

Re: OSPF - redis connected vs using area

When performing redistribution, you aren't exactly enabling OSPF on those interfaces. You are just announcing those interfaces to the rest of the OSPF domain as external routes.

When creating a new area and using the network command for those interfaces, you are actually enabling OSPF on those links and if those links are connected to other devices, you can potentially extend your OSPF domain.

No solution is better than the other one, it basically boils down on the business requirements.

HTH,

__

Edison.

1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Bronze

Re: OSPF - redis connected vs using area

When performing redistribution, you aren't exactly enabling OSPF on those interfaces. You are just announcing those interfaces to the rest of the OSPF domain as external routes.

When creating a new area and using the network command for those interfaces, you are actually enabling OSPF on those links and if those links are connected to other devices, you can potentially extend your OSPF domain.

No solution is better than the other one, it basically boils down on the business requirements.

HTH,

__

Edison.

148
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content