Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Platform limit of 64 STP instances exceeded

Hi

We are using C2950G-48-EI (12.1(22)EA12) switchs on our lan.

We have created a lot of vlans (more than 64) and set up the spanning-tree for each one.

On the switches a syslog message "Platform limit of 64 STP instances exceeded" is displayed.

I understand that exceeding this limit should cause performance issues. How can I :

Increase this limit ?

known the limit implemented (in order to anticipate problems by futur ?)

Thanks for your help...

Murielle

Everyone's tags (4)
3 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Platform limit of 64 STP instances exceeded

Murielle

You can't increase it as it is a hardware limitation not software. Couple of options -

1) do you need all vlans on all switches. If not then limit the vlans on each switch by using the "switchport trunk allowed vlans ..." on the trunk links. If the vlan is not allowed on the trunk link then STP is not run across the link and to the switch

2) look at MSTP where you can group vlans into STP instances which means you can run a lot less STP instances. See the config guide for details -

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2950/software/release/12.1_22_ea11x/configuration/guide/swmstp.html

Jon

Cisco Employee

Platform limit of 64 STP instances exceeded

Jon,

It is so good seeing and reading your responses once again!

Best regards,

Peter

Platform limit of 64 STP instances exceeded

Hi Murielle,

just to add to Jon's reply:

I remember I met the same problem several years ago and the IOS behaviour was really strange:

When 65 VLANs were created, it just stopped an STP instance running in one of the VLANs.

But not in that VLAN which was created as the last one! Just in one random VLAN :-((

So this limit was not just a performance issue, it could create L2 loops in the LAN easily.

Hopefully Cisco guys fixed that behaviour a little in the meantime, but still I'm afraid it's quite dangerous.

BR,

Milan

2477
Views
16
Helpful
3
Replies