We are gearing up to implement port security in our environment and we are considering an aging type of inactivity and an aging time of 2 minutes. This is to allow for PC and other equipment changes without requiring manual intervention.
Is there an aging time (other than 0) that would negatively affect switch performance? As I indicated above, we are currently considering two mintues. How about 2 seconds? Is this something to be concerned about?
if you set an aging time of type inactvity for 2 seconds you get:
a useless port security configuration everyone can come and plug its laptop into the port without a chance to be blocked
I would worry also about CPU usage: there should be a process that checks MAC addresses on all secured ports : setting a 2 seconds aging time will likely increase the frequency of this check and so this could lead to a bigger CPU load.
You can address this issue by informing tech people to wait 2 minutes before plugging in the new device: cables changes shouldn't happen very often.
If instead the scenario is with many changes you could consider the usage of 802.1X authentication.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...