If LLQ is configured using "priority" to handle only certain number of calls (say 24) what happens to the 25th caller? Does it get dropped or does it allowed to establish with lower priority? I believe the former is true.
BTW..I am talking about VOIP traffic without CAC being configured.
It depends on how the policy is configured and whether there is congestion. If the class is configured with the police action 'drop' then obviously traffic at a higher rate than the policy allows will be dropped. If a drop action isn't configured then it will be forwarded unless there is congestion.
Andy, your right that it will depend on whether or not there is congestion in network. LLQ does metering and utilizes a built-in policing mechanism that kicks in only when there is congestion in network.
So for my question, I am still not sure what will happen in the following situation:
1. LLQ is configured to allow 24 calls.
2. Network is experiencing congestion.
3. LLQ is not configured qith "policing" but ofcourse it will have the built-in policing mechanism working in this scenario since network is experiencing congestion.
My understanding is that if you are using Diffserv for your QOS the 25th caller will be allowed onto the network. If the network is then congested in theory all 25 calls can be degraded because packets may be randomly dropped from any of the VOIP streams.
If you want to ensure that the 25th call is not allowed on the network if there is not enough bandwidth for it you need to look at Intserv to reserve bandwidth prior to allowing the traffic onto the network.
Random may not have been the best word to use. What i was trying to get across was that if you prioritise VOIP traffic then all VOIP traffic is treated equally within that class ie. packets from one call are no different from packets from another call.
As for the 25th call being dropped. It may and it may not but that is the whole point. Lets say you have
H1 - L2 switch -> R1 -> R2 -> L2 switch - H2
H1 is making a call to H2 (and this is the 25th call). If the congestion is between R1 & R2 then the VOIP packets will be allowed onto the network at the L2 switch and then will reach R1. Packets from this call may well be dropped, but then so may packets from any of the other calls and it depends on which order they are in the queue.
That is why Diffserv is described as per-hop rather than end-to-end. Each hop treats the packets in isolation as such.
There is an inbuilt policing mechanism for LLQ to ensure there is always available bandwidth for other priorities. The problem with the original priority queue implementation was that the priority queue was always serviced before other queues but this could mean other queues were never serviced if the priority queue kept the router busy.
The in-built LLQ policing mechanism ensures that the other queues will still be serviced in periods of congestion.
LLQ will police the queue based on the configured bandwidth. If you allocate enough bandwidth for 24 calls, those calls won't experience drops (again, this configuration must be consistent in each hop on the network for end-to-end QoS).
The 25th call will be treated as a normal packet and it will be dropped or experience jitter/delay during congestion as it will not be de-queued first.
There are also options within the priority command to drop excess traffic or change its DSCP setting and forward the packet.
Agreed. Think i'm having a few problems explaining myself or i'm just talking rubbish !!
"The 25th call will be treated as a normal packet and it will be dropped or experience jitter/delay during congestion as it will not be de-queued first."
I think what i was getting at is what are the chances of the packets arriving in the exact order that it would be the 25th call's packets that would be dropped. Yes VOIP packets would be dropped but due to the constant fluctuations in network traffic it just seemed to me that if you wanted to guarantee it was the 25th calls packets then that is what Intserv/RSVP was intended to do.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...