Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Rapid-PVST vs. MST

I have been using Rapid-PVST in my environment for several years and with good success. I've never really experienced any STP problems and RPVST has always worked as promised. I am getting ready to install equipment in some new facilities and I was considering MST instead of RPVST. I was looking for some feedback with respect to the pros and cons of MST vs. RPVST.


Re: Rapid-PVST vs. MST

Quick pros and cons, I might be forgetting some.

MST Pros:

- IEEE standard

- scales well in terms of number of vlans handled (only one bpdu sent per physical link, efficient in term of CPU utilization).

MST cons:

- need to maintain the MST configuration identical on all switches in order to keep them into a single region.

- topology changes advertised with the granularity of the instance (not the vlan). This will be fixed when MVRP is available.

- interaction with PVST is not obvious and honestly not recommended if you can avoid it.

Rapid-PVST pros:

- Obvious migration from PVST.

- No MST configuration to handle.

- Provides the convergence speed of MST in most cases.

Rapid-PVST cons:

- one STP instance is ran per vlan (not scalable).

- proprietary. Interaction with third party bridges is not as obvious as what most engineers think (not all topologies can be achieved for vlans != 1 for example).

- Probably not as future-proof as MST (new features are rather developed with MST in mind).