Subnet 192.168.203.0/24 is connected to a 1900 series router. Inside the segment, there is also a Windows server (192.168.203.248) running RRAS that has 192.168.3.0/24 connected to its second NIC. RIP is turned on, both at RRAS and at the Cisco. The Cisco has a static route:
ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.203.248
pointing to the RRAS machine.
Hosts in other segments connected to the Cisco are routed properly to the 192.168.3.0 LAN but hosts inside the 192.168.203.0 segment get destination unreachable. Why and how do I get them to route properly? (If I give each workstation a static route to 192.168.3.0 via the RRAS IP, they get to it fine but I'd like to avoid routes on individual workstations.)
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 ip address 192.168.233.254 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 192.168.203.254 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 192.168.103.0 no ip redirects ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly in duplex auto speed auto
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...