Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Route_Map doesn't bring out the set clauses

i've configured the route-map on a catalyst switch 4503E but when i checked the configuration i can't see the next hop see below the output of show route-map


ML-SW-1#show route-map 
route-map test, permit, sequence 10
  Match clauses:
    interface FastEthernet2/1 
  Set clauses:



ML-SW-1#sh run  | b route-map
route-map test permit 10
 match interface FastEthernet2/1
 set ip next-hop

Any suggestions ? thanks in advance




Hi Rayan, It should be

Hi Rayan,


It should be visible in show route-map command. I am not sure if that is a bug or unsupported feature. What is the IOS version you are using in the 4503 device?


SW#sh route-map
route-map test, permit, sequence 10
  Match clauses:
    interface FastEthernet0/1
  Set clauses:
    ip next-hop
  Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes



New Member

Hi thanks a lot for your

Please provide the IOS version

New Member

Here it is :Hi Rachid,As per

Here it is :

Hi Rachid,

As per your request  find below the output of show version

ML-SW-1#sh version
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SG10, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support:
Copyright (c) 1986-2015 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 07-Apr-15 09:19 by prod_rel_team
Image text-base: 0x10000000, data-base: 0x12097724

ROM: 12.2(31r)SGA1
Dagobah Revision 226, Swamp Revision 34

New Member

Hi nkarthikeyan,I'm running

Hi nkarthikeyan,

I'm running the last version "bootflash:cat4500-ipbase-mz.150-2.SG8.bin"


New Member

I have the same problem. did

I have the same problem. did you have any solution ??????????????????????

New Member

Is in the

Is in the routing table? If it's not present, then maybe it won't show as an active set clause.

Using set ip next-hop will check for the existence of the next hop in the routing table. If it doesn't exist, it will route as normal without using the policy.