It might be helpful if we saw the entire access list 119. If some other devices are working with the route map then obviously there are other entries in the access list. Perhaps there is some order sensitivity in the access list?
It might also be helpful to do a tracert (or traceroute depending on what type of device it is) and see what is the next hop. Is it really the router with the route map configured?
It might also help if we knew what happens with traffic from those sources to those destinations. Does it get forwarded using regular routing logic or does that traffic get dropped? Especially if the traffic is dropped I would look carefully at the possibility that the route map is working and that there is some change or some problem with the VPN.
Any traffic from 10.5.118.150 to 10.130.100.27 is getting routed as expected, ie, route-map is working & the traffic is getting routed via VPN. But the vice versa is not working. Any traffic from 10.130.100.27 is getting routed over our MPLS link rather than the VPN - route-map is not working
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.