cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
539
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Route Summarization

vpollifrone
Level 1
Level 1

All, we've created the following internal networks and want to ensure that we correctly advertise with route summarization accordingly. What should the correct summarized route statement look like?

Subnets

30 /24bit user data/voip networks 10.122.[1-30].0 /24

20 /26bit server/printer/data networks 10.122.[31-40].0 .64.128.192 /26

15 /27bit networks 10.122.[41-45].0 .32.64.96.128.160.192.224 /27

Any help would be appreciated

2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

Ganesh Hariharan
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

All, we've created the following internal networks and want to ensure that we correctly advertise with route summarization accordingly. What should the correct summarized route statement look like?

Subnets

30 /24bit user data/voip networks 10.122.[1-30].0 /24

20 /26bit server/printer/data networks 10.122.[31-40].0 .64.128.192 /26

15 /27bit networks 10.122.[41-45].0 .32.64.96.128.160.192.224 /27

Any help would be appreciated

Hi,

Check out the below link for example on route summarization with step by step procedure to summarize a network to advertise.

http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=174107&seqNum=3

Hope to Help !!

Ganesh.H

Remember to rate the helpful post

View solution in original post

Jon Marshall
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

vpollifrone wrote:

All, we've created the following internal networks and want to ensure that we correctly advertise with route summarization accordingly. What should the correct summarized route statement look like?

Subnets

30 /24bit user data/voip networks 10.122.[1-30].0 /24

20 /26bit server/printer/data networks 10.122.[31-40].0 .64.128.192 /26

15 /27bit networks 10.122.[41-45].0 .32.64.96.128.160.192.224 /27

Any help would be appreciated

You can't summarise in one statement unless you want to include more networks than you have ie.

10.122.0.0 255.255.192.0    would summarise  10.122.0.0 -> 10.122.63.0

If you only want to summarise the actual networks you have  -

10.122.0.0 255.255.224.0  =  10.122.0.0 -> 10.122.31.0

10.122.32.0 255.255.248.0  =  10.122.32.0 -> 10.122.39.0

10.122.40.0 255.255.252.0 =   10.122.40.0  -> 10.122.43.0

10.122.44.0 255.255.254.0  =  10.122.44.0 -> 10.122.45.0

note the last 4 entries above could be replaced by

10.122.32.0 255.255.240.0  but this would include a few extra networks at the end because it works out as  10.122.32.0 -> 10.122.47.0

Jon

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Ganesh Hariharan
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

All, we've created the following internal networks and want to ensure that we correctly advertise with route summarization accordingly. What should the correct summarized route statement look like?

Subnets

30 /24bit user data/voip networks 10.122.[1-30].0 /24

20 /26bit server/printer/data networks 10.122.[31-40].0 .64.128.192 /26

15 /27bit networks 10.122.[41-45].0 .32.64.96.128.160.192.224 /27

Any help would be appreciated

Hi,

Check out the below link for example on route summarization with step by step procedure to summarize a network to advertise.

http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=174107&seqNum=3

Hope to Help !!

Ganesh.H

Remember to rate the helpful post

Jon Marshall
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

vpollifrone wrote:

All, we've created the following internal networks and want to ensure that we correctly advertise with route summarization accordingly. What should the correct summarized route statement look like?

Subnets

30 /24bit user data/voip networks 10.122.[1-30].0 /24

20 /26bit server/printer/data networks 10.122.[31-40].0 .64.128.192 /26

15 /27bit networks 10.122.[41-45].0 .32.64.96.128.160.192.224 /27

Any help would be appreciated

You can't summarise in one statement unless you want to include more networks than you have ie.

10.122.0.0 255.255.192.0    would summarise  10.122.0.0 -> 10.122.63.0

If you only want to summarise the actual networks you have  -

10.122.0.0 255.255.224.0  =  10.122.0.0 -> 10.122.31.0

10.122.32.0 255.255.248.0  =  10.122.32.0 -> 10.122.39.0

10.122.40.0 255.255.252.0 =   10.122.40.0  -> 10.122.43.0

10.122.44.0 255.255.254.0  =  10.122.44.0 -> 10.122.45.0

note the last 4 entries above could be replaced by

10.122.32.0 255.255.240.0  but this would include a few extra networks at the end because it works out as  10.122.32.0 -> 10.122.47.0

Jon

thanks for the help, much appreciated

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card