Router with two ISP connections, cannot only PING one WAN interface
I have an 1811 router with two ISP WAN connections
Ethernet0 ip address x.x.x.x
Ethernet1 ip address y.y.y.y
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 y.y.y.1
I can PING the E0 x.x.x.x address, but not the y.y.y.y address. If I remove the first "ip route" statement, then I CAN PING the y.y.y.y address, but then I lose the ability to PING the x.x.x.x address.
Is there any way that I can PING BOTH at the same time?
(there are no dynamic routing protocols in place, no routing advertisements from the ISP or anything..)
I'm assuming that I must have at least one default route (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0) statement configured on the router so I don't want to remove both routes because the router is many miles away and not easy to reconfigure if I lose access to it.
(Is this assumption wrong? Can I get away with not having any "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" statements in my config? and if so, will removing both of them probably fix my problem?)
Re: Router with two ISP connections, cannot only PING one WAN in
Even if you configured multiple static default routes with the command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x; the router will only select the best path to network 0.0.0.0, and install that route in the ip routing table.
If you do a (#show ip route), you should be able to see the network that the router is actually using to forward traffic to network 0.0.0.0.
As far as been able to ping your interfaces ip address; do you mean from your internal network? Or from the outside?
If you mean from your internal network; the networks connected to your ISPs must be distributed to your internal network through a routing protocol. If they are not distributed into your internal network through an IGP only the network that is configured as the default route will be the only one you will be able to ping, as it seems to be the case.
If you have multiple connections to one or more ISP's BGP might be appropriate might be appropriate because it allows manipulation of path attributes, facilitating the selection of the optimal path.
Excerpt from RFC 2270:
"a problem exists in that many ISPs can only support the load-sharing and reliability requirements of a multi-homed customer if that customer exchanges routing information using BGP-4 which does require an AS as part of the protocol."
If BGP is not an option for you, then I would suggest multiple routers, one for each ISP connection. Then you can use an IGP and route maps to load balance your traffic between connections.
P.S I'm not CCIE, so If there is a CCIE or someone with more expirience that can help clarify this the better.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...