I have two sites that each have a router and switching. I am going to connect these two sites through a fiber connection. The one subnet is 10.110.46.0/24 and the other site is 10.110.145.0/24.
Each router has a MPLS connection back to the corporate office that is using BGP to route. Since these sites will be able to connect via fiber I would like to route them over the LAN and not the wan.
Do I need to create a new interface on each router. So on the 10.110.145.254 router do I need to create a 10.110.46.X interface. And on the 10.110.46.254 router do I need to create a 10.110.145.x interface?
Once these are created as directly connected routes should they sites start talking to each other over the LAN as opposed to the WAN?
Also, all the switches live in the same VTP domain.
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...