11-22-2011 05:08 PM - edited 03-07-2019 03:32 AM
I am going to configure link aggrate between our switching core/distribution layer and one of our access switches. Both are cisco (3750 and 2960).
We have implemented link aggregation in other parts of our network and I would like to use the same standard for conistency.
However when I run show commands the Protocol feild is always just "-". I wish to know if it is LACP or PAgP. I have tried this on all switches that have link aggregation on them but get the same result each time.
Here is an example:
CPCore001#show etherchannel summary
Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
I - stand-alone s - suspended
H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
R - Layer3 S - Layer2
U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator
u - unsuitable for bundling
w - waiting to be aggregated
d - default port
Number of channel-groups in use: 7
Number of aggregators: 7
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1 Po1(SU) - Gi4/0/1(P) Gi4/0/2(P)
2 Po2(SU) - Gi1/0/3(P) Gi1/0/4(P)
3 Po3(SU) - Gi1/0/5(P) Gi1/0/6(P)
25 Po25(SU) - Gi2/0/9(P) Gi2/0/10(P)
26 Po26(SD) - Gi2/0/11(D) Gi2/0/12(D)
37 Po37(SD) - Gi1/0/17(D) Gi1/0/18(D)
39 Po39(SU) - Gi4/0/7(P) Gi4/0/8(P)
CPCore001#
Is there a way I can tell what link aggregation type is being used?
11-23-2011 01:31 PM
Hello Steven and other friends,
Please allow me to join this discussion.
Regarding the channeling protocols, Leo is correct. If the show ether summary command says "-" in the Protocol column, the EtherChannel has been configured statically using the on mode, and no negotiation of port bundling takes place. Alternatives are active/passive for LACP and desirable/auto for PAgP. These modes are disjunctive - they cannot be combined on a single port. A port can be either on or active or passive or desirable or auto but never any combination of two or more of these modes. If a textbook suggests otherwise, it is most probably incorrect on this subject.
About the silent/non-silent modes in PAgP, they prove to be very confusing. Essentially, the silent/non-silent modes were devised as a primitive way of detecting unidirectional links, obviously before UDLD and L1 detection methods were more common. Without trying to go into much detail here, I suggest not specifying any of them when configuring PAgP (let the default value in place). Please also check the following two URLs for an in-depth discussion of the silent/non-silent:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a00800949c2.shtml#silent
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_white_paper09186a00801b49a4.shtml#cg6 (scroll down a couple of pages to find the discussion about silent/non-silent)
Regarding the inability of the EtherChannel to come up, can we try to configure it once more? Please try using the desirable keyword on both ends and leave out any silent/non-silent keywords. Thanks!
Best regards,
Peter
11-24-2011 03:27 PM
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the advice.
Unforunately I cannot retest the creation of the EtherChannel until next week. The link in question connects to our DR site where our primary backup server lives. I need to follow regulation RFC processes and get it approved however I don't see this being refused.
I wil try what you suggest on my home network setup over the weekend and update this thread with my result and then again next week once I've tried again on the production environment.
Again thanks for the help.
11-28-2011 08:43 PM
I have tried to configure EtherChannel excluding the non-silent keyword but to no avail.
I used the following commands:
CORE SWITCH
Switch1(config)# interface range gi40/4-5
Switch1(config-if-range)# channel-protocol pagp
Switch1(config-if-range)# channel-group 5 mode desirable
ACCESS SWITCH
Switch2(config)# interface range gi0/47-48
Switch2(config-if-range)# channel-protocol pagp
Switch2(config-if-range)# channel-group 5 mode desirable
As before the core EtherChannel po5 (I changed the port channel number to start fresh) did not come up, however it appeared as if the interfaces joined their respective port channels.
Below are some show commands:
Switch1# show interfaces po5
Port-channel5 is down, line protocol is down (notconnect)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 001d.468c.df05 (bia 001d.468c.df05)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 2000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 4/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is unknown
Media-type configured as connector
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
Members in this channel: Gi4/0/4 Gi4/0/5
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 1814000 bits/sec, 230127 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 36987000 bits/sec, 643175 packets/sec
3547625993 packets input, 2703375078 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 456706943 broadcasts (0 multicast)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
53 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 73718023 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
2204682451 packets output, 1550006496 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 8 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Switch1# show int po5 etherchannel
Age of the Port-channel = 00d:00h:17m:44s
Logical slot/port = 10/5 Number of ports = 2
GC = 0x00050001 HotStandBy port = null
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = PAgP
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 00 Gi4/0/4 Desirable-Sl 0
0 00 Gi4/0/5 Desirable-Sl 0
Time since last port bundled: 00d:00h:02m:18s Gi4/0/5
Time since last port Un-bundled: 00d:00h:13m:24s Gi4/0/5
After bringing down the EtherChannel from the CORE switch I checked the ACCESS switch. I noticed the po5 duplex and speed settings on the ACCESS switch were auto-duplex and auto-speed whereas the CORE switch had po5 as full-duplex and 1000Mb/s.
When I tried to change the po5 interface to have a manual speed I got the following result:
Switch2(config-if)#speed 1000
Command rejected! GigabitEthernet0/47 in port-channel does not support speed change
I am not sure if this gives a clue as to why it is not working.
Again any help is appreciated.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide