Cisco sems to be good at 'small carbon footprint', which is all well and good, but...
I have to nail the switches onto the wall because they no longer fit in the d@mn racks! Not every building has a full-depth rack, unfortunately. In older buildings I have to make do with what was put in for phone patching. And often, if we don't watch the contractors very carefully, they still sneak in shallow racks today.
And you can't get a full-depth 8U rack. (For smaller locations)
Having a bunch of 2960 8ports is a mess both in the rack and management wise.
Is it really that difficult to build shallow-depth switches?
I'd love 24port or 48port switches that's no deeper than the stone-age 2950 (9.5" ), even if they were 2U instead of 1U...
Sorry... Just wenting... (About to start replacing 3750-24port switches with 2960XR-48ports... and in dire need of a shoehorn... )
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...