I have posted a similar topic a few months back without getting any replies so im hoping to get someones input this time
One of our end costumers is trying to poll the Total Power Consumption MIB (OID 184.108.40.206.220.127.116.11.18.104.22.168) using Cisco Works and Cisco NCS from a 2960 switch
The problem is we notice we are getting inaccurate results, when the values differ greatly between what we see in Cisco Works/NCS and in the output of show power inline from the switch. We are polling and issuing the command at the same time and the results are not even close to each other.
Im providing screenshots of the results when issueing SNMP WALK and the output of the command show power inline from two switches showing the same
Have anyone encountered such an issue? Any suggestion on something we might be missing?
I'm not sure it's a bug. I'm monitoring 3750-X's. I guess it could be, but I think it's something to do with the "measured" part of the status. It records this OID as being power used as "measured". If that's the case then it's great because it means it's more accurate and show power inline. Show power inline seems to just add up the allocated power.
It might be the OID is more accurate, it would just be nice to get confirmation of that fact.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...