I want to create a port span for a vlan which has around 80 servers. I know monitoring a physical interface has virtually no performance effect on the switch but im not too sure about a vlan with 80 servers. The switch is a 4506. The output interface will be on the same switch which will go out to an IPS.
Would spanning a vlan have the same performance effect of say, monitoring 80 ports?
Be careful, if traffic is enough then first you'll first fill up the port's buffer and then the group of 8 ports of the line card (in case you have lets say a WS-X4548-GB-RJ45). This is when it gets dangerous because the 4500 will try to allocate more buffer space on the linecard's controller (here is where performance of all ports of the line card will suffer). Since the 4500 will still try to put the excessive traffic somewhere if it uses the sups ASICs you get a lot of issues even high CPU.
I have seen it a couple of times.
As a rule, just to keep it safe, don't send more data to the SPAN destination port than what it will be able to handle.
In the 4500 line cards that is comething like 1Gb / 8
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...