Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Spanning-tree portfast

Guys,

Across all of my access layer switches (including trunk ports) we have the configuration 'spanning-tree portfast' enabled. I fully understand and appreciate the need of having this on access layer switchports but is it really necessary to have it applied on a trunk?

Thanks

Darren

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

Darren,

Again the logical port channel/etherchannel is an aggregation of physical ports, which will be connected other networking devices or server supporting aggregation, rather than an end station, so you can safely remove it. In fact, it shouldnt even be present. Normally portfast on a port, always think end station would be connected to that port, which would not generate any BPDUs.

HTH

Lejoe

6 REPLIES

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

No as you pointed, it should not be applied to a trunk, considering that normally other networking devices are connected to the trunk rather than an end station.

HTH

Lejoe

New Member

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

Hi Lejoe,

Thanks for the prompt response.

You would also not expect to see this configured on a logical Port/Etherchannel either?

The guy who implemented the network has just flashed it across all interfaces both physical and logical! and Im not just trying to tidy up. Again I don't believe they should be configured here

Thanks

Darren

Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

Darren

The only place i would expect to see "portfast trunk" is on a trunk connection to a NIC on a server that can also run 802.1q.

Jon

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

I agree with Jon. In fact, I asked almost the same exact question the other day. :-) (Mine was more along the lines of uplinkfast and why I would use it instead of portfast trunk.) Seemed to do the same thing, but very different. Actually, it's different because of the way spanning-tree handles the cost of the link and the bridge priority, but that's another thread. :-)

--John

HTH, John *** Please rate all useful posts ***

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

Jon,

Thanks for pointing that out.

Lejoe

Re: Spanning-tree portfast

Darren,

Again the logical port channel/etherchannel is an aggregation of physical ports, which will be connected other networking devices or server supporting aggregation, rather than an end station, so you can safely remove it. In fact, it shouldnt even be present. Normally portfast on a port, always think end station would be connected to that port, which would not generate any BPDUs.

HTH

Lejoe

127
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies