I understand the differences between the three, I just wanted to get some clarification on a few things.
With Process Switching, a route lookup is done against the the destination ip address in the packet, will go out through the next hop inteface, which is in the routing table, and the L2 mac-rewrite is done via the ARP table. This is done for each and every packet, without regard to SIP/DIP pair.
With Fast Switching, a route lookup is done against the destination ip address in the packet, if its a new remote network (not in the fast cache), the first packet is process switched, and the next hop/L2 mac-rewrite information is put in a route-cache. Now, if another packet comes in for a host on this network, (seeing as if the forwarding information cache hasn't been flushed), it adds a specific host entry, and already knows the next hop intf/L2 mac-rewrite.
CEF, once the route-lookup is done, it doesn't need to look up the forwarding information, since the CEF and AT already have this information, and off it goes.
Please correct me if I'm wrong on the above statements.
My next question is, when you see the /24 and /32, what exactly determines if a /24 or /32 is put in the route-cache, FIB?
I'm pretty sure I know the answer, but I would like people smarter than me to respond first
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.