cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
976
Views
6
Helpful
9
Replies

Traceroute completed after 3 replies from host

muca
Level 3
Level 3

Hi, does anyone know any reason for tracert to be completed only after 3 response times from the host?

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.18.0.1

2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.30.255.14

3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.30.255.1

4 <1 ms<1 ms <1 ms 172.30.0.13

5 <1 ms<1 ms 2 ms 202.x.x.x

6 * * * Request timed out.

7 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.29.51.141

8 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.29.51.141

9 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 172.29.51.141

Trace complete

9 Replies 9

royalblues
Level 10
Level 10

Whenever you do a trace you send 3 probes and hence you see 3 responses

HTH

Narayan

What I mean is:

7 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.29.51.141

8 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.29.51.141

9 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 172.29.51.141

What Narayan said is true. But your question is also valid. I've seen it many a times with destination repeating itself. What i found is there might be multiple paths to reach the destination. In your case 3 paths.

hope that clarifies.

pls rate all helpful posts.

smothuku
Level 7
Level 7

Hi ,

The router will send 3 traceroute packets with TTL of 1 and will know the next hop because the next hop returns the TTL exceeded message. It will then send 3 traceroute packets with TTL of 2, and so on sending 3 packets each time that it increases the TTL until it reaches the destination.

Because of 3 trace packets you are seeing same ip repeating thrice..

Thanks,

satish

Hi,

I think Narayan and Satish have covered you question, just as a reference, please check the following document:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_tech_note09186a00800a6057.shtml#traceroute

HTH,

Mohammed Mahmoud.

I know this post is from 2007, but I never knew this and have been in networking a long time.... nice to learn something new about networking 101!

mheusing
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

The interesting entry is: 6 * * *

This usually is because of a firewall or other secured device. A definite answer could only be given by the administrator of the firewall.

The most likely explanation for me is, that this firewall or secured router performs NAT/PAT, i.e. translates internal addresses into 172.29.51.141 where "internal" is from the viewpoint of the firewall.

Thus you might have two routers (7 + 8) and the internal host (9) with different internal addresses all being translated to the same IP by the firewall/secured router.

Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.

Regards, Martin

Hi Martin,

Perfect explanation.

Murilo, can you please confirm.

BR,

Mohammed Mahmoud.

Two pix. However the firewall administrator of the 1st pix is not performing any NAT/PAT but definitely on the other end we have NAT.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card