Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Community Member

Unable to Ping or SNMP management address on two Switches in network

All

This is a very strange problem I am having.

In basic I have a server at our HQ site that is unable to ping, snmp, or anything to two switches on a remote site over the wan. Its strange because i can perform exactly the same task to two other switches in the same subnet to addresses either side of the non-working addresses.  If you perform a trace to the site it gets a response all the way to the sites L3 switch and is unable to hop across to the vlan the switches are using for management.

To add more strangeness to this a server at the HQ site on the same subnet as the first server has no problems at all????? This can see all the switches on site.

How can two servers in the same subnet get two different responses?

Server 1 -

     IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.30.76

     Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0

     Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.30.254

Server 2 - 10.0.30.185 / 24

     IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.30.185

     Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0

     Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.30.254

Switch  10.220.56.7 - from Server 1

Tracing route to 10.220.56.7 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.30.252
  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.220.20.2
  3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.99.154
  4     8 ms     7 ms     3 ms  10.255.251.14
  5     9 ms     7 ms     5 ms  10.244.1.254
  6     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  7     *        *        *     Request timed out.

Switch 10.220.56.7 - from Server 2

Tracing route to 10.220.56.7 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.30.252
  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  128.1.100.4
  3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.99.154
  4     9 ms     7 ms     7 ms  10.255.251.14
  5    10 ms     7 ms     3 ms  10.244.1.254
  6     7 ms     7 ms     8 ms  10.220.56.7

Trace complete.

 

Switch 10.220.56.8 - from Server 1

Tracing route to 10.220.56.8 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.30.252
  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.220.0.130
  3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.99.154
  4     7 ms     3 ms     7 ms  10.255.251.14
  5     8 ms     7 ms     3 ms  10.244.1.254
  6     8 ms     9 ms     7 ms  10.220.56.8

Trace complete.

Switch 10.220.56.8 - from Server 2

Tracing route to 10.220.56.8 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.30.252
  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  128.1.100.4
  3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.99.154
  4     9 ms     5 ms    10 ms  10.255.251.14
  5    10 ms     4 ms     7 ms  10.244.1.254
  6     6 ms     5 ms     6 ms  10.220.56.8

Trace complete.

Same Code:

Switch 10.220.56.7 - *    1 52    WS-C2960-48PST-L   12.2(55)SE5           C2960-LANBASEK9-M

Switch 10.220.56.8 - *    1 52    WS-C2960-48PST-L   12.2(55)SE5           C2960-LANBASEK9-M        

Management Vlan:

Switch 10.220.56.7

interface Vlan15

ip address 10.220.56.7 255.255.254.0

!

ip default-gateway 10.220.56.1

 

Switch 10.220.56.8:

interface Vlan15
ip address 10.220.56.8 255.255.254.0
!
ip default-gateway 10.220.56.1

Any help would be much appreciated

3 REPLIES
Community Member

Unable to Ping or SNMP management address on two Switches in net

Justin, I think that could be a problem in an access list.

Have check you this?

Community Member

Unable to Ping or SNMP management address on two Switches in net

Sorry No ACL being used, totaly open.

Thanks

Community Member

Unable to Ping or SNMP management address on two Switches in net

Okay this has now been solved!

The switches were WS-C2960-48PST-L running 12.2(55)SE5.

All routing had been checked by our maintenance support guys but they found nothing.

Reloaded the switch and we regined full service back from the server; this worked for both switches that had the same problem. This must be a bug in the Cisco code or somthing, very strange but now working fine.

248
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies
CreatePlease to create content