Vlan config not propagated to port-channel members
Has anyone encountered a situation when adding a Vlan to (or removing a Vlan from) a Port-channel interface doesn't result in the same change being applied to its member interfaces? It just happened to me on a ME3400G-12CS running 12.2(55)SE8... One weird thing is that the channel wasn't brought down as a result of this mismatch, and another weird thing is that the issue only seems to occur on that particular device (other MEs running the same release don't seem to behave like that).
Well i'm not sure that adding/removing vlans from port-channel automaticaly adds coresponding commands to its members...i think that you need to do that by your own on that members...but again thats straight out of head - didn't tested...
For your other constraint (that only one device behaves wrongly) could you post adequate configurations? I think that there must be something different.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.