Either I am overlooking something obvious or this whole addressing scheme makes no sense as you have overlapping address ranges for instance the level 2 servers address of 172.20.1.100/23 , this address range covers everything from 172.20.0.0- 172.20.1.255 so it overlaps everything else unless that is a misprint on the drawing . Guess I don't understand what you are asking here . Anything that has a /23 mask covers 512 addresses which puts everything in 1 vlan , are they asking you to break it up or what are trying to accomplish here ?
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...