I'm just testing this out. I have configured two VRF instance. And I'm exporting and importing vrf table from Cust-A to vice versa.
ip vrf Cust-A
rd 1:1
route-target export 1:1
route-target import 1:1
route-target import 2:2
!
ip vrf Cust-B
rd 2:2
route-target export 2:2
route-target import 2:2
route-target import 1:1
interface FastEthernet0/1/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no ip mroute-cache
load-interval 30
full-duplex
no cdp enable
!
interface FastEthernet0/1/0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 99
ip vrf forwarding Cust-A
ip address 10.192.168.1 255.255.255.0
no cdp enable
!
interface FastEthernet0/1/0.2
encapsulation dot1Q 169
ip vrf forwarding Cust-B
ip address 10.192.169.1 255.255.255.0
no cdp enable
If I do show ip route vrf Cust-A or Cust-B ..
show ip route vrf Cust-B
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.192.169.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1/0.2
show ip route vrf Cust-A
Routing Table: Cust-A
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.192.168.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1/0.1
If i'm importing and exporting route target from both VRf than both VRF should exchange routing table and I must see Cust-A routes in Cust-B VRF table and vice versa..
what i'm doing wrong here...
Second, what if i want my Cust-B users to access internet while internet default route is in global table?
Note: I'm not gonna use any routing protocol for this lab. I just wana use static routing...
