Review the picture first, and I will briefly introduce you into question.
R1, R2, R3 and R4 run OSPF/LDP/BGP bundle over black links which interconnects them. They belong to same BGP AS and runs iBGP between each other. Networks 10.10.10.0/24 and 188.8.131.52/24 belongs to same VRF, lets name it Technical in further references. All four routers have instance of vrf Technical, cos in essence all of them are PE routers and have connections to other networks belonging to this vrf.
We have a target – to move traffic between networks 10.10.10.0/24 and 184.108.40.206/24 (ONLY!!!) to different physical connection (RED link between R2 and R4) with possibility to swap back to MPLS links in case of RED link failure.
Cos we have two upstream connections from R1 and R4, traffic between 10.10.10.0/24 and 220.127.116.11/24 networks get load balanced between those links (maximum-paths ibgp2) , and this make a major problem for me.
My idea is run VRF LITE over RED link and establish BGP neighborship between R2 and R4 inside adress-family ipv4 vrf Technical andcontrol preferred path between R2 and R4 to reach desired networks using standard BGP path control facilities.
But problem is that some traffic from 10.10.10.0/24 to 18.104.22.168/24 can choose path not through R2 but through R3, and in such conditions that traffic will be forwarded further over link R3-R4, cos R3 will not receive at all update about 22.214.171.124/24 network from R2 direction – we run iBGP between all routers, and inside VRF LITE only R2 have connection to R4. But desired for me path is R3-R2-R4. How to make R3 choose it but preserve possibility to “to swap back to MPLS links in case of RED link failure”?
I have following considerations:
•1) We can configure reliable static routing on R3 through R2 with tracking remote end of RED link
Comment: I don’t like this solution – it seems odd for network run BGP/OSPF use reliable stat routing.
•2) Add VRF LITE link between R3 and R2 and establish iBGP neighborship between R3 and R4 through these VRF lite links
•3) Connect R3 to RED link aswell with some “HUB” placed on RED link and establish iBGP neighborship between R3 and R4 directly.
To be honest I don’t like not only first but every solution I adduce. So I wondering is there any other ways to solve these task?
I have seen this requirement to steer traffic for a specific VPN via a specific path in the core. This is normally addressed by using MPLS TE and to change the vpnv4 next hop so that only traffic for this specific VPN is forwarded down the tunnel.
There are many cases on CSC documenting this approach.
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...