Can someone look at this configuration and help me troubleshoot why my port-channel did not come up?
I have a 6513 with a SUP 720 10G and a 4510 with SUP 6E. I installed new 10Gig uplinks and tried to configure a port-channel but could not get it to come up. Both the 10G uplinks showed UP and UP but my port channel never came up. Here is the config I was going to use.
on the 4500 series switch , i can see the second port being configured as switch port mode access ... also if you have ports working as a trunk link why would you have them as spanning tree port fast configuration on it.
also , configure all you settings on the interface port channel and just have the physical interface as the part of that channel group.
I see dot1q trunk on Po2 - Te7/4 & Te8/4 - 6500 You should put dot1q on 4500 too , just to make sure. Maybe 4500 doesn't support dot1q. You can check it on the internet for that line card. Try to use no int Po2 , then use int range and set parameters for group interfaces and issue also
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.