02-08-2012 09:53 AM - edited 03-07-2019 04:48 AM
Hi
With regards to the Access/Distribution/Core layers of a network, most Cisco diagrams tend to show each access switch having links to two distribution switches, and each distribution switch having links to two core switches. The obvious point of this is redundancy, if any distribution switch or core switch [or the links between them] fail then traffic will be directed to another device via either STP/HSRP/OSPF/EIGRP, etc.
However, most diagrams also show an etherchannel between the two distribution switches. My question is why is this etherchannel necessary? Without it each distribution switch already has redundant links to the core so why add a loop? I realise STP will block this loop, but Cisco best practices seem to suggest removing reliance on STP as much as possible to improve convergence times, so wouldnt the network do just as well without a direct link between distribution switches?
Thanks in advance
02-08-2012 02:22 PM
I think one of the answers is if your connection between the dist and core switch goes down or the core switch goes down this will not cause hsrp or spanning tree churn as it will just take another route across that crosslink and out the other side .Routing protocol convergenge is generally quite a bit quicker than waiting for hsrp, spanning tree etcc to settle out . How does the diagram show it , as a routed port channel ?
02-09-2012 02:18 AM
The diagrams in question are in the "Enterprise Campus 3.0 Architecture:Overview and Framework" document on the Cisco Design Zone:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Campus/campover.pdf
Figure 1 on page 6, figure 3 on page 10 and figure 4 on page 11 all show an etherchannel between the 2 distibution switches, along with redundant routes into the core. Figure 5 on page 13 in particular shows that the "best" design has redundant links to the core switches and an etherchannel to the other distribution switch [but doesnt specify if this etherchannel is layer 2 or layer 3].
Would a routed etherchannel be preferred to a layer 2 etherchannel?
02-09-2012 07:01 AM
Hello Graham,
Though they haven't clearly mentioned whether it's a Layer 2 or Layer 3 port-channel, but they are talking about ECMP which clearly suggests the entire CORE-DISTRIBUTION is a Layer 3. So, Distribution-Distribution is again a Layer 3. HSRP traffic is flowing via the Layer 2 switches (Access switches) below to provide First hop redundancy to the hosts.
Regarding etherchannel between 2 distribution switches, i feel that's just for Layer 1 HA. Even we can have that between Core's. This is my personal feeling.
Thanks
Vivek
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide