Problem with upgrading from 6.0.6 to 6.0.7

[moby_doll]

Hello

i have a new appliance and like to upgrade it from 6.0.3 (3188) 32 to 6.1.1 (3445).

Until 6.0.6.3368 it goes fine, now i have a problem with 6.0.7.

I gett following error message:

[pnadmin]$ pnupgrade -u xxx:xxx ftp://172.25.1.21/csmars-6.0.7.3404.zip

CSMARS Upgrade...........[25938]

Loading..................[csmars-6.0.7.3404.zip]

    User.................[gizmo]

    Protocol.............[ftp]

    Host.................[172.25.1.21]

    Path.................[csmars-6.0.7.3404.zip]

    Modified.............[Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:48:10 GMT]

    Size.................[211661498]

######################################################################## 100.0%

Upgrade..................[MGT-MRS-01]

    From.................[6.0.6.3368.34]

    To...................[6.0.7.3404.36]

[Error][check_dependency/547]: minimal allowed version(6.0.6.3368.35) > current version(6.0.6.3368.34).

Now, where do i get version "6.0.6.3368.35"? I get only "6.0.6.3368.34" from support page or can i do something other?

Thanks for help, Elke

[praprama · Accepted solution]

Hi Elke,

I am not sure if you have downloaded the same file, but please try the below package out and let me know if it works:

http://tools.cisco.com/search/display?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cisco.com%2Fcgi-bin%2FSoftware%2FTablebuild%2Fdoftp.pl%3Fftpfile%3D%2Fcisco%2Fcrypto%2F3DES%2Fciscosecure%2Fcs-mars%2Fcsmars-6.0.6.3368.zip&pos=2&strqueryid=1&websessionid=sYp-Ss5wQP2QHr8E5ON...

To the best of my knowledge, this is 6.0.6.3368.35.

Let me know if this helps!!

Cheers,

Prapanch

[moby_doll]

Hallo Prapanch,

thanks a lot, this one functioned well:

Upgrade..................[MGT-MRS-01]

    From.................[6.0.6.3368.34]

    To...................[6.0.6.3368.35]

I've already upgraded to 6.1.1.

[pnadmin]$ version
6.1.1 (3445) 38

Though, i have a actual system now.

Thank you for your time and support!

Elke

[praprama · Accepted solution]

Hi Elke,

Thanks for the update. Please mark this post as answered.

Regards,

Prapanch