Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Metro Ethernet vs Leased line

Guys,

I'm setting a proposal for WAN link. there will 2 option, 45 MB leased line and 100 Metro ethernet. I need to know what is the pro/cons for this 2 technology as i need to explain to the customer.

Do anybody have a link or explaination on this?

Thanks

Rezzo

  • MPLS
1 REPLY

Re: Metro Ethernet vs Leased line

WAN vs Metro

1) Future BW Expansion : Metro-E BW expansion is as very easy compared to adding leased circuits to the WAN.

2) Service levels : Since Metro-E is a service it has better service levels than a traditional WAN link.

3) Finally Cost: In most cases the BW cost derived per Leased Circuit to that of Metro-E Link is higher in most places.

What may make the choice of WAN more practical is the availability of WAN only and no Metro service in a area.

Plus if the customer is not at all comfortable with a shared infrastructure link like Metro-E.

HTH-Cheers,

Swaroop

262
Views
2
Helpful
1
Replies