I believe this is lab invironment and not production setup where you have to use BGP as PE-CE protocol on PE1 and OSPF as PE-CE protocol on PE2.
Now once you have two BGP route on PE1 VPN table, it will prefer route from PE2 over CE1 route because of lower AS-PATH attribute. To prefer CE1 route, you can set weight on PE1 router for neighbor 184.108.40.206 which will be locally significant.
BGP routing table entry for 9:9:220.127.116.11/32, version 124
Paths: (2 available, best #1, table ABC)
Advertised to update-groups:
Refresh Epoch 1
18.104.22.168 (metric 11) from 22.214.171.124 (126.96.36.199)
Origin incomplete, metric 21, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
The Cisco EPN system incorporates a network architecture designed to consolidate multiples services on a single Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) transport network. This network is designed primarily based on Application Engineered...
Internet security is important with the increasing attacks that are happening every day. Many internet and browsing security solutions exist, but some are not very easy to use or maybe the question is how can I enable them?
Cisco Software Manager Server
This document describes the programmatic interfaces, RESTful APIs, which are supported by Cisco Software Manager Server (CSM Server).
CSM Server supports a set of finite RESTful APIs. The fir...