Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

redistribute connected vs network command under address-family ipv4 vrf

Hi there,

On my implementation, PE-CE link, point to point /30, I configured under address-family redistributed connected.

There is an example I've seen using network command such as below:

!

address-family ipv4 vrf test

no auto-summary

no synchronization

redistribute static

network 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.252

!

Is there any major/minor different between those implementation?

Thanks in advance.

4 REPLIES
New Member

Re: redistribute connected vs network command under address-fami

Hi,

The differnce should be on the ease of extended implementation and the standard followed ( as you seem to be asking from the Service Provider end)

Next time you add another interface, you will have to specify another network command for the /30 IP subnet used for PE - CE link.

Cheers

Prince

New Member

Re: redistribute connected vs network command under address-fami

Hi,

Aha! Sound logic mate! Thanks!

cheers!

New Member

Re: redistribute connected vs network command under address-fami

If this under the MPBGP there will also be a difference between the origin of the route. One will be reported (i) the other (?).

-W

Silver

Re: redistribute connected vs network command under address-fami

Redistribute connected is used when when we want to redistribute the connected routes and with the help of network command we are using dynaic routing for this.

regards

shivlu

468
Views
5
Helpful
4
Replies