05-19-2005 11:25 PM
Hi Friends.
Consider a scenario for single metro H-VPLS:
CE1-->MTU-s-->PE-RS1-->PE-RS2
|
|
PE-RS3
A single spoke Pseudowire is setup between the MTU-s and PE-RS1. Will there be a unique VCID for this Pseudowire???Say if there's one more MTU say MTU-s' connecting to PE-RS1, will there be two different Pesudowires and virtual circuits setup between PE-RS1 to MTU-s and PE-RS1 to MTU-s'?????Will there be two differnt VPLS switch instance for connectivity between PE-RS1 and MTU-s and PE-RS1 and MTU-s'????
I'm unable to understand the difference between Single spoke Pseudowire,Virtual circuit and VPLS Switch instance!!!!!!
Thanx
RAJ
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-23-2005 12:35 AM
Raj,
Find the attachment herein and see whether that answers ur all questions.
MITHIL
05-23-2005 12:35 AM
05-26-2005 04:33 AM
Hi Mithil,
That's fine. I'm trying to understand the concept. Well, ur pdf is useful I should say!!!
THNX
RAJ
01-11-2011 12:17 PM
Lets take this a bit further.
Pseudo-wire point to point(only)
allows specific VLan(s)
doesnt learn Mac-addresses.
VPLS
Point to point(e-line)
point to multi-point(e-tree)
multipoint to multipoint(e-lan)
mac-addresses learned so if point to point use pseudo-wires.
use neighbor statements to control branches, and split-horizon to protect from loops
use mac-in-mac to control learned mac-address.
Regards
Jude
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide