On this particular one, 188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206.220.127.116.11 returns integer 5, which corresponds to the slot number where the supervisor module is. The only difference I find so far is this switch has an empty slot 1, unlike the few others I checked. Does that explain why the snmpset works against the others even though the SUPs are really all in slot 5, but fails against this one?
What're the potential pitfalls of simply using the following, without having to bother with specifying the slot number, etc. as in the previous approach?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.