I have the following upgrade scenario and I'm not sure about how licensing related details works there. There is LMS 3.x system working and I want to upgrade it to 4.1. To do this I've got two migration licences: 3.x->4.0 and 4.0->4.1. I want to install LMS 4.1 from the scratch if possible, and what is important, I will not migrate database from the 3.x version to the new installation. I want to have clean system without network elements which will be added manually later on. As I've read, backed up database contains licensing information from the version 3.x. Is this licensing related information stored in the backup a condition to usage of 3.x->4.0 upgrade licences instead of full-paid 4.0 licences in the system? In other words, can I skip the restore (which I prefer) of 3.x database and use 3.x->4.0 licences on the clean 4.0 system? My doubt raises a fact, that we are losing in such situation a track of 3.x licences in the system, and if such a procedure would be possible, it would look like a loophole in the licensing system, allowing a new 4.0 user use cheaper 3.x->4.0 licences instead of ordinary 4.0 licences.
thank you in advance for all clarifications and hints,
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...