I'm creating a template to check if OSPFv3 is authenticated. So my thinking is, not to check the interfaces for authentication if both these conditions are not met.
1) The router has ospfv3 running?
+ ipv6 router ospf [#.*#]
2) If it exists, check the interface for ospfv3 configuration
+ ipv6 ospf [#.*#] area [#.*#]
3) Then finally if both previous conditions are true check
+ [#ipv6 ospf authentication .*#]
So my problem ends up when I try to set #2 as a prerequisite for #3. If #1 is already a prereq for #2 I check the box to "Mark as Prerequisite" and it grey's out the former option.
Is this an available option or is there a better way to go about this? It seems the same amount of processing since it will need to walk all the interfaces, but there could be interfaces that match the #2 condition and not #3.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...