Is it expected behavior by NetConfig that if an "Unrecognized command" is configured in a config-mode job, the devices will be listed as "Non Applicable Devices"? The only device that got passed is currently unreachable. Is that unreachability why NetConfig lets it through, since it cannot verify the validity of the command on it?
The 6500s have been recently converted from CatOS to IOS. Each had gone through a Conflicting Device stage, which required having RME update DCR with the new sysID OID. It almost appears as if NetConfig is failing to recognize these as valid IOS devices, despite RME realizing it elsewhere.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.