Q? for longtime LMS 2.1 users- is LMS 2.5 worth the effort?

[bnidacoc]

After I finally have some improved reliability in the LMS2.1/RWAN1.2 bundles (but its still not completely reliable), have you found the migration/efforts in setting up LMS 2.5 worth you efforts?

Is LMS 2.5 more reliable/stable?

What new features (and they must really work) have really impressed you?

And, which OS are you running on?

[nhabib]

If you plan to go to LMS 2.5, keep in mind that as of now, there is no ACLM version that can run on the same server.

It is highly suggested to run LMS 2.5 in parallel with LMS 2.1 until you are familiar with all the differences that exist between the applications.

[yjdabear]

Does your suggestion apply to LMS 2.2 and 2.5 as well?

Does Cisco plan to implement Reloads Report (among other LMS 2.2 features that got dropped) in LMS 2.5, before LMS 2.2 reaches EOS by the end of 2006?