I agree that there are many useful features missing in LMS 2.5.1. It seems that features that were in 2.2 were removed. There are a lot of nice new features in 2.5.1, but I wish some of the features of 2.2 were still available. I like the new LMS so good job LMS team.
Dear LMS developers
Here are some features that I would like to see in the next version of LMS.
1. Regular expressions for device group rules.
2. Drop down lists for the user defined fields.
LMS 2.2 had this.
3. Schedule reports that can be e-mail ID to rather
than just a notification that the report was run.
4. Device name field with selection button on the
Device and Credentials | Device Management
screen. Makes it easier to select devices you want
5. If I am making a device selection by typing in
the device name and I hit select give me a list
of devices that match what I have typed in thus
far. Don't make me have to type in a FQDN if there
is only on device in the DCR that matches my
request. I really liked the JAVA device selector
in LMS 2.2. As I typed in a device name it
narrowed the list down. I know this is a difficult
feature for an all HTML interface but there must
be some way to do it.
6. If I do a bulk import let me select the file from
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...