It seems very simple question, but it made me go thinking and thinking and decided it would be worthwhile to share it here with you.
I am building a small network with one core switch doing all inter vlan routing and connecting to two edge routers (these routers are used for different purpose).
I am planning to use a management vlan having all the switches as part of it. And I was thinking of using loopback interfaces on the routers and use static routing so the core knows where they are located.
My question (which may seem stupid here ) was to ask whether having loopback here would be really worthwhile? or if there is a better way in regards to management of the network devices?
having a loop back really only makes sense if you have more than 1 path into the router. If you have a single network connection into the switch and that connection goes down, having a loop back wouldn't help much.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.