I have remote sites with legacy DN ranges that are disjointed. What is the most efficient method (with respect to call processing) of covering all DNs to a site? A single monolithic xlation pattern, or a series of more targeted and specific ranges? For example: DN range 3100 - 3199 & 3500 - 3700. Would 3XXX be better, or would 31xx & 3[5-7]xx be the more efficient?
It depends on wheater there is an overlap in the 3XXX range for other devices. If not this will be the most efficient since as soon as you dial 3X this pattern will be matched, and you only need one TP instead of 2. If there is a possible overlap in 3XXX range such as 3300, I would suggest going with the 2 TPs.
You have reached the Cisco Logistics Support Center.. To Check Status of
your RMA, visit Product Returns & Replacements (RMA). Need help? Contact
us by Phone or Email. North Americas Phone: 1800 553 2447 Option 4
Email: email@example.com Europe Phone: +3...
The short answer is that you don't.... That isn't entirely true while at
the same time it kind of is, but for the most part you don't configure
the softkeys. You enable or disable them via TCL. Here is the long
answer. Be sure to read the whole thing or e...
Topology: IP Phone > Switches > Microsoft NPS setup to forward 802.1x
proxy to > ISE 2.1 patch 3 Authentication: EAP-TLS using Cisco MIC SANs
Phone Models 802.1X support? 802.1x flavor Addtl Comment EAP-MD5 EAP-TLS
Cisco 3905 Y Y N Cisco 6911 Y Y N Cisco ...