11-09-2000 02:24 AM - edited 03-12-2019 10:49 AM
We need to fragment the IP packets to transfer it through a low bandwith line. But it is possible to do so if we use IP unnumbered. What is the reason for this? In any way can't we use IP addressing on serial ports while using fragmantation?
11-13-2000 01:02 PM
recommend using mlppp w/interleave to fragment ip over low b/w serial links.
11-30-2000 10:37 AM
You can always decrease the MTU of the interface to fragment.
12-12-2000 04:41 PM
How can you decrease the MTU, I have one with 1500 bytes, but I want to decrease it, in a 3810 and a 3640 with vofr
12-05-2000 01:52 AM
you don't say what kind of line you are using.
If using Frame relay, you should use FRF.11/12.
If using leased lines, consider creating a multilink interface with the leased line circuit as the sole member. Under multilink interfaces you can configure interleaving.
see
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c/qcpart6/qclfi.htm
Greg
12-06-2000 05:12 PM
I don't recommend using fragmentation for video at all. We found that the reassempbly of packets adds too much latency and jitter to the stream that the resultant video looks poor. You should use a link speed higher that 768k at a minimum to eliminate the need for fragmentation.
12-07-2000 05:35 PM
Be careful using MTU as the fragmentation method as there are applications (IBM spring to mind) that don't like it. Also, reducing the MTU means that the packets stay smaller until they hit the destination reducing throughput and increasing bandwidth used.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: