Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

Bronze

Gatekeeper vs Locations

HI

2 CM Clusters (A and B) with one GK at A doing ICT-GK btwn A and B. Cluster A also has 2 SRST Sites with location CAC.

If your using Low Cost Routing (LCR) OR TailEnd Hopoff (TEHO), wouldn't this create inaccuracy in monitoring the amount of available WAN BW as Location CAC and GK CAC are mutually exclusive?

There should be one CAC monitoring the WAN BW but if there are 2 CAC (CM and GK) and they do not share info about the BW, then there would be inaccuracy in BW CAC right?

1 REPLY
Silver

Re: Gatekeeper vs Locations

You can choose either of these two methods of call admission control, but you cannot combine them in the same Cisco CallManager system. If your system does not contain IP WAN links with limited available bandwidth, you do not have to use call admission control.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_administration_guide_chapter09186a008013936d.html#59667

97
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies