Stick with H323 if you are wanting to do call control for PSTN calls, because, with MGCP, it is doable from CallManager using a combination of Route Patterns / Translation Patterns, but it is MUCH more convoluted than what you currently have established with your translation rules, which look pretty clean to me. If there is no GOOD reason to change, leave it alone....
Ah yes. But my users, they want caller ID text to display with the # on their phones. That is what is motivating the move to MGCP. I thought the same thing about the possibility of using translation patterns but I don't see how that would work. There is no way to match a calling # in a translation pattern.
For MGCP I would create a Translation pattern to translate the incoming called number to a number that doesn't exist on the system, or translate the number to a CTI route point that forwards to voicemail where you can record a message that the call is being blocked.
I'm not able to access my old voice mail messages all of a sudden. The recording says something like 'the message is currently not available'. This has never happened before in all the years I have been using this system. I have t...
If you have 2 ISR routers, one acting as Failover, do we need to have both the same number of SRST licenses on the 2 routers?
No. You will only need the SRST licenses on the primary router. Because this feature...