Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Multiple incoming dial-peer matched

Dear,

Could someone, tell me why after matching an incoming-peer on "answer-address" system matches for same call another  incoming dial-peer based a "destination-pattern" ... shouldn't the system start looking for outbound dial-peer once first incoming diapeer matched?

046565: Feb  3 17:56:57: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

   Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming Dial-peer=360

046566: Feb  3 17:56:57: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

   Calling Number=1660, Called Number=, Voice-Interface=0x0,

   Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,

   Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH

046567: Feb  3 17:56:57: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

   Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming Dial-peer=360

046568: Feb  3 17:56:57: //-1/4C84D3B79834/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

   Calling Number=1660, Called Number=+32495243137, Voice-Interface=0x0,

   Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,

   Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH

046569: Feb  3 17:56:57: //-1/4C84D3B79834/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

   Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_INCOMING_DNIS; Incoming Dial-peer=1

Dial-peers:

dial-peer voice 360 voip

corlist incoming toBRICall

description ** AGENT COR PEER **

translation-profile outgoing E164IncomingSIP

preference 2

voice-class codec 1

session protocol sipv2

session target ipv4:10.161.10.170

dtmf-relay rtp-nte

fax rate disable

ip qos dscp cs5 signaling

no vad

destination-pattern 166.

answer-address 166.

!

!

dial-peer voice 1 voip

session protocol sipv2

incoming called-number .

dtmf-relay sip-notify

codec g711alaw

no vad

!

Thank you.

Best regards.

Marc

5 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Gold

Multiple incoming dial-peer matched

You can see debug walking over all the DPs but what matters is that "right" one is selected.

Isn't that your case ?

New Member

Multiple incoming dial-peer matched

Dear Paolo,  Peer ID 1 is used to route the call. What I don't understand, is that dialpeer 360 has longer pattern match and a higher precedence (I set Peer 1 preference to 3 afterwards). Router peer hunting is set to 0, so no reason for me for the system to use peer 1 instead of peer 360.  Also, when I remove peer 1, call is correctly routed using peer 360  Thank you for your feedback.  Marc

New Member

Multiple incoming dial-peer matched

Dear Paolo,  Peer ID 1 is used to route the call. What I don't understand, is that dialpeer 360 has longer pattern match and a higher precedence (I set Peer 1 preference to 3 afterwards). Router peer hunting is set to 0, so no reason for me for the system to use peer 1 instead of peer 360.  Also, when I remove peer 1, call is correctly routed using peer 360  Thank you for your feedback.  Marc

Super Bronze

Multiple incoming dial-peer matched

Hi

Dial peer matching (inbound and outbound) has a list of attributes that are used in a specific order.

For inbound peers, 'incoming called-number' has top priority, so the other command you set are not checked as this 'incoming called-number .' matches any called number!

Destination-pattern is the lowest priority match for an inbound peer, and answer-address is lower priroty than incoming called-number.

See this doc for the process in detail:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a008010fed1.shtml#topic1

Aaron Harrison

Principal Engineer at Logicalis UK

Please rate helpful posts...

Aaron Please remember to rate helpful posts to identify useful responses, and mark 'Answered' if appropriate!
New Member

Multiple incoming dial-peer matched

Dear Aaron,

I know that, as you can see, my "answer-address" get a match and as told to Paolo, is up and functionnal. Do you have any idea why the router still goes thourgh and match a "destination pattern" peer instead?

Thank you for your feedback.

Best regards.

Marc

690
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content